2016
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18S rRNA V9 metabarcoding for diet characterization: a critical evaluation with two sympatric zooplanktivorous fish species

Abstract: The potential of the 18S rRNA V9 metabarcoding approach for diet assessment was explored using MiSeq paired‐end (PE; 2 × 150 bp) technology. To critically evaluate the method′s performance with degraded/digested DNA, the diets of two zooplanktivorous fish species from the Bay of Biscay, European sardine (Sardina pilchardus) and European sprat (Sprattus sprattus), were analysed. The taxonomic resolution and quantitative potential of the 18S V9 metabarcoding was first assessed both in silico and with mock and fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To circumvent this problem, we suggest here a method based on abundance ranks. The semiquantitative or rank-level value of metabarcoding data has been shown in several contexts (e.g., Kelly et al, 2014b;Sun et al, 2015;Abad et al, 2016;Albaina et al, 2016, Hänfling et al, 2016. Our method is expected to filter out potential biases, at the cost of partially sacrificing the quantitative information present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To circumvent this problem, we suggest here a method based on abundance ranks. The semiquantitative or rank-level value of metabarcoding data has been shown in several contexts (e.g., Kelly et al, 2014b;Sun et al, 2015;Abad et al, 2016;Albaina et al, 2016, Hänfling et al, 2016. Our method is expected to filter out potential biases, at the cost of partially sacrificing the quantitative information present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although there are methodological limitations (e.g., PCR bias, gene copy numbers), sequence reads provide semi-quantitative information for zooplankton biomass (Lindeque et al, 2013;Hirai et al, 2015a;Albaina et al, 2016;Clarke et al, 2017), which is not directly comparable with the number of individuals in morphological analysis. We nevertheless observed similar seasonal patterns in diversity indexes, abundance-based community structures, and taxonomic compositions between the metagenetic and morphological analyses.…”
Section: Seasonal Changes In Dominant Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forward primer 1389F was used in combination with the reverse primer 1510R. This set of primers was developed as a standard marker of marine microbial eukaryotic diversity and has also shown reliable amplification of marine zooplankton assemblages (Pearman et al, 2014;de Vargas et al, 2015;Pearman and Irigoien, 2015;Albaina et al, 2016). All primers had a Roche 454 tag and a 10 bp barcode.…”
Section: Dna Isolation Amplification and Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%