2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3722-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of malignancy in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: The results of our meta-analysis reveal high diagnostic performance of FDG PET in the detection of malignancy responsible for PNS, not affected by the presence of onconeural antibodies or clinical characteristics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strengths of this study include a large heterogeneous patient cohort and long follow-up period. The cancer prevalence was 12.1%, which is similar with other studies [ Table 4 ],[ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ] although slightly higher than Kristensen et al who also excluded patients with previously diagnosed tumors from their group composition and reported a cancer prevalence of 8.8%. [ 7 ] Our prevalence may be in the higher range due to a greater proportion of suspected paraneoplastic syndrome cases (88% vs. 49%) and possibly higher pretest probability as other differentials were extensively investigated before the 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan was used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strengths of this study include a large heterogeneous patient cohort and long follow-up period. The cancer prevalence was 12.1%, which is similar with other studies [ Table 4 ],[ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ] although slightly higher than Kristensen et al who also excluded patients with previously diagnosed tumors from their group composition and reported a cancer prevalence of 8.8%. [ 7 ] Our prevalence may be in the higher range due to a greater proportion of suspected paraneoplastic syndrome cases (88% vs. 49%) and possibly higher pretest probability as other differentials were extensively investigated before the 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan was used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Two recent meta-analyses have been published on the use of 18 F-FDG PET scan in suspected paraneoplastic syndrome. [ 14 15 ] The study published by Sheikhbahaei et al in recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 F-FDG PET and 18 F-FDG PET/CT in patients with paraneoplastic syndrome demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.81, specificity of 0.88, and moderate diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). The area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.916.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that whole-body [18F]FDG-PET and [18F]FDG PET/CT are very useful in the screening of patients with suspected paraneoplastic syndrome and positive paraneoplastic antibodies [ 12 ]. However, a recent study conducted by another group suggested that the presence of paraneoplastic antibody should not be an indispensable factor for performing [18F]FDG PET/CT [ 13 , 14 ]. In our study, the effectiveness of [18F]FDG PET/CT in the detection of pathology in patients with the presence and absence of onconeuronal antibodies was confirmed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging diagnosis of the primary malignancy in PNS is challenging; reports suggest that FDG‐PET is highly sensitive and specific for detection of occult malignancy, particularly in patients with hormone receptor negative tumors . Tumor size and grade are also important predictors of FDG‐PET performance, with more false negatives reported in patients with small, low‐grade tumors .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%