2017
DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and infectious diseases: current applications and future perspectives

Abstract: In this article, we summarize the available evidence and potential future applications of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of infectious diseases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined anatomic and functional imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is slowly gaining a foothold in the management of invasive fungal infections [ 55 ]. In current clinical practice, standalone FDG-PET/CT is not generally sufficient to differentiate IPA from malignancy or other active inflammatory lesions, such as active tuberculosis [ 55 ]. However, significant different FDG-PET/CT patterns in invasive and non-invasive forms of aspergillosis have been described [ 56 ].…”
Section: Radiological Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined anatomic and functional imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is slowly gaining a foothold in the management of invasive fungal infections [ 55 ]. In current clinical practice, standalone FDG-PET/CT is not generally sufficient to differentiate IPA from malignancy or other active inflammatory lesions, such as active tuberculosis [ 55 ]. However, significant different FDG-PET/CT patterns in invasive and non-invasive forms of aspergillosis have been described [ 56 ].…”
Section: Radiological Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When evaluating a patient with potential implant infection, the surgeon is limited by three key factors. First, it is impossible to confidently discriminate infection from aseptic loosening due to limitations in current imaging modalities, including metal artifacts from the implant (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Second, the surgeon cannot differentiate S. aureus from other bacteria, a distinction that affects management and prognosis; species-specific intraoperative antimicrobial adjuvants can only be utilized if the bacteria is diagnosed prior to completing the operation (9, 11, 12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…implants and have limited utility due to metal artifacts that obscure the bone-implant interface (15)(16)(17)(18). Clinical algorithms that combine PET imaging with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) can be employed (19), but 18 F-FDG accumulates at sites of both infectious and aseptic inflammation (20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Дополнительным методом диагностики служит КТ-ангиография, которая позволяет диагностировать признаки сосудистой инвазии и окклюзии; чувствительность и специфичность этого метода -0,94 и 0,71 соответственно [34]. Использование позитронно-эмиссионной томографии с 18F-фтордезоксиглюкозой не позволяет в полной мере дифференцировать ИА легких от других воспалительных очагов или метастатического поражения [35].…”
Section: рисунокunclassified