2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-018-1260-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor parameters and radiomics features in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma as predictors of treatment outcome and survival

Abstract: Whole-body MTV correlates with response to therapy in patient with aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Tumor texture features could not predict therapy response, although several features correlated with the presence of a residual mass at the end of therapy CT and others correlated with disease-free and overall survival. These parameters should be prospectively validated in a larger cohort to confirm clinical prognostication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
65
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the classifier using the largest lesion were not satisfactory (accuracy = 60%), but the small sample size prevent any speculation about their reliability. Conversely, the RUBTE provided promising results when all lesions were used for the analysis, similarly to the previous investigations [14,15,32,33]. Unlike, in the study by Milgrom et al the authors found the mediastinal lesion-derived features could predict patient outcome, while features extracted from all lymphoma sites did not predict refractory disease [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Results of the classifier using the largest lesion were not satisfactory (accuracy = 60%), but the small sample size prevent any speculation about their reliability. Conversely, the RUBTE provided promising results when all lesions were used for the analysis, similarly to the previous investigations [14,15,32,33]. Unlike, in the study by Milgrom et al the authors found the mediastinal lesion-derived features could predict patient outcome, while features extracted from all lymphoma sites did not predict refractory disease [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Results of the classifier using the largest lesion were not satisfactory (accuracy=60%), but the small sample size prevent any speculation about their reliability. Conversely, the RUBTE provided promising results when all lesions were used for the analysis, similarly to the previous investigations [10,11,30,31]. Unlike, in the study by Milgrom et al the authors found the mediastinal lesion-derived features could predict patient outcome, while features extracted from all lymphoma sites did not predict refractory disease [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Most studies acknowledge the difficulties in the assessment of multiple lymphoma lesions. Some used boxes or VOIs to constrain individual tumors [ 6 , 8 , 12 ], or limited segmentation to a representative maximum of 5 lymphoma lesions [ 26 ], but none of these studies compared such strategies with another workflow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%