2022
DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18F-FDG PET/CT May Predict Tumor Type and Risk Score in Gestational Trophoblastic Disease

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of 18 F-FDG PET/ CT in predicting pathological prognostic factors, including tumor type and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) score, in gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Methods: Retrospective monocentric study including 24 consecutive patients who underwent to 18 F-FDG PET/CT from May 2005 to March 2021 for GTD staging purpose. The following semiquantitative PET parameters were measured from the primary tumor and used for the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have malignant potential, and it is widely accepted that a diameter of GIST ≥ 20 mm should be treated [8]. The diagnosis of GIST originates from the development of molecular biology, and needs to be determined by combining histological findings and immunohistochemical results [9,10]. The biological risk of GIST is closely related to the location, size, shape, density, presence or absence of necrotic cystic degeneration and calcification, presence or absence of ulceration, invasive growth and the blood supply of the tumor; but the most critical factor in determining the biological risk of GIST is its histological mitotic number, which is the proliferation state and activity of the cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have malignant potential, and it is widely accepted that a diameter of GIST ≥ 20 mm should be treated [8]. The diagnosis of GIST originates from the development of molecular biology, and needs to be determined by combining histological findings and immunohistochemical results [9,10]. The biological risk of GIST is closely related to the location, size, shape, density, presence or absence of necrotic cystic degeneration and calcification, presence or absence of ulceration, invasive growth and the blood supply of the tumor; but the most critical factor in determining the biological risk of GIST is its histological mitotic number, which is the proliferation state and activity of the cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 F-FDG PET/CT is far superior to other imaging modalities in its sensitivity for detecting aggressive cutaneous lesions, suggesting great potential in the clinic. Several studies have attempted to delineate a methodology for using 18 F-FDG PET/CT to generate a global disease score [32,[36][37][38] A singular score generated at every follow-up visit may simplify assessment of disease progression, as well as predict the prognosis of disease in patients with PCL. Although a global disease score is a potentially useful clinical parameter, the method is limited by its lack of technical standardization and external validation.…”
Section: Treatment Response Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the estimation of quantitative data such as imaging-derived parameters has recently attracted great interest [31] and is currently under evaluation as an innovative tool for improving disease characterization and tumour heterogeneity [32]. With respect to 18 F-FDG PET images, standardized uptake value maximum and mean (SU-Vmax, SUVmean), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) are among the most encountered and investigated parameters, now recognized as biomarkers of pathophysiological processes in several types of tumours [33][34][35][36]. Moreover, compared to the earliest radiomic features currently under investigation, these parameters are not limited by clinical applicability and interpretability, being: (i) easily computable by physicians using standard clinical software during a conventional qualitative analysis, (ii) clearly interpretable by clinicians as strictly correlated to biological tumour processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%