2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-005-0005-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18F-FDG accumulation in atherosclerosis: use of CT and MR co-registration of thoracic and carotid arteries

Abstract: The results of our study suggest that not all atherosclerotic plaques show high FDG accumulation. FDG-PET studies of plaques with the use of fused images can potentially provide detailed information about atherosclerosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…18 F-FDG PET/CT, if proven, may offer an attractive alternative to vulnerable plaque imaging in some patients. The ability of this method to reliably measure aortic and carotid active plaque has been now demonstrated in several studies (4,35,36). Coronary imaging has been limited, however, by the myocardial uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…18 F-FDG PET/CT, if proven, may offer an attractive alternative to vulnerable plaque imaging in some patients. The ability of this method to reliably measure aortic and carotid active plaque has been now demonstrated in several studies (4,35,36). Coronary imaging has been limited, however, by the myocardial uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The utility of FDG PET to reliably measure aortic and carotid active plaque has been now demonstrated in several studies. 7,11,12 Coronary imaging has been limited, however, by the myocardial uptake. Variety of factors affects the myocardial FDG uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of TBR has been justified by indicating that it was a blood-corrected uptake measurement (31,38). Yet, blood activity actually adds to wall activity due to the spatial blurring of the PET images (imperfect spatial resolution) and to the tissue fraction effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%