2008
DOI: 10.1002/tax.573046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(1851) Proposal to conserve the name Planchonella nom. cons. against the additional names Iteiluma and Peuceluma (Sapotaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe the species represents an old evolutionary lineage, the sole extant member confined to New Caledonia. Planchonella baillonii is also the type species of Iteiluma, a name rejected in favour of Planchonella (Swenson & Morat, 2008;Brummitt, 2011a), but considering its phylogenetic position it is possible to recog nize a monotypic genus. However, we reject this solution since P. baillonii possesses the entire set of characters diagnostic for Planchonella.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We believe the species represents an old evolutionary lineage, the sole extant member confined to New Caledonia. Planchonella baillonii is also the type species of Iteiluma, a name rejected in favour of Planchonella (Swenson & Morat, 2008;Brummitt, 2011a), but considering its phylogenetic position it is possible to recog nize a monotypic genus. However, we reject this solution since P. baillonii possesses the entire set of characters diagnostic for Planchonella.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note. -Planchonella is conserved against Iteiluma and Peuceluma (Swenson & Morat, 2008;Brummitt, 2011a). How ever, Pierre (1890) described Planchonella, Beauvisagea, Bureavella, and Fontbrunea in the same publication, i.e., four competing names with equal priority.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation