2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2017.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

183 W nuclear dipole moment determined by gas-phase NMR spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors determined the nuclear magnetic moment with much higher accuracy for an unstable 26 Na nucleus (1.1 s half-life time) using an improved version of the β-technique NMR combined with ab initio calculation of nuclear magnetic shielding performed for the stable 23 Na reference. New studies and further possible improvements in the determination of magnetic moments for stable nuclei also appeared [101][102][103][104], and three review papers on the same subject were published [105][106][107].…”
Section: Nuclear Magnetic Dipole Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors determined the nuclear magnetic moment with much higher accuracy for an unstable 26 Na nucleus (1.1 s half-life time) using an improved version of the β-technique NMR combined with ab initio calculation of nuclear magnetic shielding performed for the stable 23 Na reference. New studies and further possible improvements in the determination of magnetic moments for stable nuclei also appeared [101][102][103][104], and three review papers on the same subject were published [105][106][107].…”
Section: Nuclear Magnetic Dipole Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very helpful for the cross-checking of available experimental results and permits a better understanding of nuclear magnetic shielding. In our opinion, the application of Equation (10) is very promising because the number of reliable data for nuclear magnetic moments is quickly growing [ 83 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 ]. We also have an excellent reference standard of shielding, which is independent of temperature, the isolated helium-3 atom.…”
Section: Universal Approach To Shielding Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value, recalculated from Equation ( 10) using fluorine parameters -frequency and shielding constantis -406.2 ppm is in moderate agreement with the calculated one. Another important modification of the procedure shown above relies on measurements of 183 WF6 substance where CF4 or C2F6 gaseous buffers were used [42]. They are necessary for lengthening the relaxation times and narrowing the 183 W resonance signals.…”
Section: Preprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%