1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0145-2126(97)81399-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

171 Idarubicin, fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF (FLAG-IDA) for the treatment of high risk MDS or AML

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poor results were also obtained in patients with karyotypic abnormalities at diagnosis, confirming the pivotal role of cytogenetics in predicting the clinical outcome in AML [19]. For patients with primary resistant AML as well as for those with adverse cytogenetic features at diagnosis, it may be reasonable to potentiate the FLAG with additional drugs such as idarubicin or mitoxantrone [20][21][22]. The toxicity of the regimen was mild considering that most patients had been heavily pretreated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Poor results were also obtained in patients with karyotypic abnormalities at diagnosis, confirming the pivotal role of cytogenetics in predicting the clinical outcome in AML [19]. For patients with primary resistant AML as well as for those with adverse cytogenetic features at diagnosis, it may be reasonable to potentiate the FLAG with additional drugs such as idarubicin or mitoxantrone [20][21][22]. The toxicity of the regimen was mild considering that most patients had been heavily pretreated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%