Debating Development 2001
DOI: 10.3362/9780855986858.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

17. Heroism and ambiguity: NGO advocacy in international policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 One persistent concern was that civil society, particularly at the global level, was fundamentally dominated by elites. Research from both development studies 21 and political science 22 highlighted CSOs' use of elite mechanisms. Some argued that civil society replicated and magnified the power imbalances of the old state system rather than remedying them.…”
Section: Developing a Context-based Standard Of Democratic Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 One persistent concern was that civil society, particularly at the global level, was fundamentally dominated by elites. Research from both development studies 21 and political science 22 highlighted CSOs' use of elite mechanisms. Some argued that civil society replicated and magnified the power imbalances of the old state system rather than remedying them.…”
Section: Developing a Context-based Standard Of Democratic Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%