2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(18)35790-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1668: Side Effects of Transrectal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in the Local Treatment of Prostate Cancer in 8 Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it was decided for this review to focus on HIFU as primary therapy for prostate cancer. Considering this, 25 articles/ abstracts evaluating HIFU with the Ablatherm [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] and five with the Sonablate device were selected [23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it was decided for this review to focus on HIFU as primary therapy for prostate cancer. Considering this, 25 articles/ abstracts evaluating HIFU with the Ablatherm [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] and five with the Sonablate device were selected [23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all, 37 articles/abstracts of studies evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of HIFU in prostate cancer were selected [5–41]. Data on HIFU as salvage therapy after RT were limited; only two fully published papers and five abstracts were identified [28–34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, these patients need a therapeutic approach for their prostate cancer. We offered these patients HIFU as a local therapy and analyzed efficacy and side effects since 2000 [16].…”
Section: Incidental Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%