1963
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.10.184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1660-MeVY1*Hyperon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1967
1967

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Background was subtracted for each bin in the manner described in an earlier publication. 2 The resulting graph, Fig. 2, shows no sign of a peak at the 7-ray mass squared, and fits the experimental resolution function with the center at the 7r° mass squared.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Background was subtracted for each bin in the manner described in an earlier publication. 2 The resulting graph, Fig. 2, shows no sign of a peak at the 7-ray mass squared, and fits the experimental resolution function with the center at the 7r° mass squared.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…--> A7r + 7r T described in Ref. 2 was subtracted in each angular bin; however, we assumed that the background for the rj's is linear from 505 to 595 MeV, rather than drawing a background curve by eye as was done in the co case. Our results, combined with those of Sec.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work based in part on a fraction of the data presented here (approximately one-third of the total data at 1.51 BeV/c) indicated a very low__branching ratio of the 1660-MeV isobar into the KN system (Tj^/Ttotai = #~0.04). 18 The experiment of Bastien and Berge was shown to be inconsistent with a value of x smaller than 0.16. 19 In appraising the significance of this discrepancy, we must remember the difficulties associated with studying a resonance with a relatively low production cross section in the presence of a much stronger effect (K* in this case).…”
Section: B K 0^ Systemsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Firstly, study of high energy ir~p interactions at Berkeley has given a value of approximately 0.2 for x. 20 Then, if we use the F*(1660) branching ratio given by Alvarez et al, 18 x turns out to be less than or equal to 0.04. Thus all indications are that the Y*KN decay rate is quite low, although the exact value is still undetermined.…”
Section: B K 0^ Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%