2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.01.171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

164 Cost Comparison of HeartMate II Implantation and Cardiac Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 As with transplant, the first year of LVAD support that includes the initial implantation is the most expensive, and the high cost is offset by lower costs in subsequent years. More recently, Adamson et al 32 observed a significant reduction in average hospital costs of 41% while the transplant costs increased by 17%. Moreover, VAD/transplant hospital cost ratio was 3.14 in 2006 and 1.6 in 2010.…”
Section: Cost-effectiveness Of Pulsatile Lvads Pulsatile Flow Lvads Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 As with transplant, the first year of LVAD support that includes the initial implantation is the most expensive, and the high cost is offset by lower costs in subsequent years. More recently, Adamson et al 32 observed a significant reduction in average hospital costs of 41% while the transplant costs increased by 17%. Moreover, VAD/transplant hospital cost ratio was 3.14 in 2006 and 1.6 in 2010.…”
Section: Cost-effectiveness Of Pulsatile Lvads Pulsatile Flow Lvads Amentioning
confidence: 99%