2005
DOI: 10.1007/11530657_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

16. Self-Organization in Peer-to-Peer Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, we propose an IQ metric that supports an Information Fusion (IF) model based on a flat Peer-to-Peer (P2P) network (the connections among peers are formed arbitrarily and without any kind of hierarchy, that is, all the peers act as equals [1]) with no dedicated elements beforehand (servers, switches, hubs, and so on) [2]. The IF model works in a way that a certain external agent (denoted Ω) queries the P2P network, composed of different agents, in search for a certain information and then, the agents (denoted α) in the network collaborate for providing an answer as accurate as possible.…”
Section: Manuscript Filementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, we propose an IQ metric that supports an Information Fusion (IF) model based on a flat Peer-to-Peer (P2P) network (the connections among peers are formed arbitrarily and without any kind of hierarchy, that is, all the peers act as equals [1]) with no dedicated elements beforehand (servers, switches, hubs, and so on) [2]. The IF model works in a way that a certain external agent (denoted Ω) queries the P2P network, composed of different agents, in search for a certain information and then, the agents (denoted α) in the network collaborate for providing an answer as accurate as possible.…”
Section: Manuscript Filementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An open question is how much can self-organization emerge as an essential feature for improving the quality of the services. Requirements for selforganization in peer-to-peer networks [4] include issues like feedback, reduction of complexity, randomness, self-organized criticality and emergence.…”
Section: Management Of P2p Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many existing P2P systems including DHT designs are relatively static to be considered self-organising in their model. de Meer and Koppen (2005) also evaluate several existing unstructured and structured overlays and determine that these satisfy few criteria for self-organisation.…”
Section: Self-organisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently conventional techniques for managing telecommunications networks (Terplan, 2001;Buford, 2001) and enterprise networks (Stallings, 1999) have not generally been applied to peer-to-peer overlays. Current mechanisms for self-organisation are limited (de Meer and Koppen, 2005;Biskupski et al, 2007) including inability to prevent free riders, adapt to imbalanced loads, and lack of metrics for detecting perturbations. Hence, as we discuss, active overlay management is needed to make overlays a sustainable platform for general purpose service delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%