Reflections on Language and Language Learning 2002
DOI: 10.1075/z.109.23dee
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

16. Content-based language teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models are generally credited for improving the target language proficiency while producing students who are as competent in their subject matter as students in control groups (Stohler, 2006). Recent European and North American research indicates that CBI produces strong second language (L2) proficiency and subject matter expertise while satisfying both students and teachers (Deen & Hacquebord, 2002;Jappinen, 2005). Grabe and Stoller (1997) state that increased motivation and engagement are attributable to CBI.…”
Section: Content-based Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are generally credited for improving the target language proficiency while producing students who are as competent in their subject matter as students in control groups (Stohler, 2006). Recent European and North American research indicates that CBI produces strong second language (L2) proficiency and subject matter expertise while satisfying both students and teachers (Deen & Hacquebord, 2002;Jappinen, 2005). Grabe and Stoller (1997) state that increased motivation and engagement are attributable to CBI.…”
Section: Content-based Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies and others (Grabe & Stohler, 1997) credit this approach with improving the target language proficiency while producing students who are at least as competent in their subject matter as students in control groups. Recent European and North American experiments have produced strong second language proficiency and subject matter expertise while satisfying both students and teachers (Deen & Hacquebord, 2002).…”
Section: Content and Language Learning In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%