155 Risk Stratification in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: AIMS65 Is Superior to Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall Scoring Systems in Predicting Inpatient Mortality

Robertson, Marcus; Majumdar, Avik; Boyapati, Ray; Chung, William W.; Terbah, Ryma; Wei, James; Lontos, Steve; Vaughan, Rhys

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.037

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Like the aforementioned South Korean study, this was a relatively small study that furthermore included patients presenting with lower GI bleeding, a condition for which neither the GBS nor AIMS65 score is validated. A retrospective Australian study analysed 424 patients presenting with both ANVGIB and variceal bleeding 5. They found AIMS65 to be superior to the GBS in predicting inpatient mortality, while the GBS was superior in terms of predicting need for RBC transfusion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk assessment in acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding: the AIMS65 score in comparison with the Glasgow–Blatchford score in a Scottish population

Palmer

Moroni

McLeish

et al. 2015

Frontline Gastroenterol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The early use of risk stratification scores is recommended for patients presenting with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds (ANVGIB). AIMS65 is a novel, recently derived scoring system, which has been proposed as an alternative to the more established Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS). Objective To validate the AIMS65 scoring system in a predominantly Caucasian population from Scotland and compare it with the GBS. Design Retrospective study of patients presenting to a district general hospital in Scotland with a suspected diagnosis of ANVGIB who underwent inpatient upper GI endoscopy between March 2008 and March 2013. Outcomes The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures were requirement for endoscopic intervention, endoscopy refractory bleeding, blood transfusion, rebleeding and admission to high dependency unit (HDU) and intensive care unit (ICU). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was calculated for each score. Results 328 patients were included. Of these 65.9% (n=216) were men and 34.1% (n=112) women. The mean age was 65.2 years and 30-day mortality 5.2%. AIMS65 was superior to the GBS in predicting mortality, with an AUROC of 0.87 versus 0.70 ( p<0.05). The GBS was superior for blood transfusion (AUROC 0.84 vs 0.62, p<0.05) and admission to HDU (AUROC 0.73 vs 0.62, p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the scores with respect to requirement for endoscopic intervention,

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%