2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04841.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

15. Consequences of the Chernobyl Catastrophe for Public Health and the Environment 23 Years Later

Abstract: More than 50% of Chernobyl's radionuclides were dispersed outside of Belarus, Ukraine, and European Russia and caused fallout as far away as North America. In 1986 nearly 400 million people lived in areas radioactively contaminated at a level higher than 4 kBq/m(2) and nearly 5 million individuals are still being exposed to dangerous contamination. The increase in morbidity, premature aging, and mutations is seen in all the contaminated territories that have been studied. The increase in the rates of total mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, arguing that children have been and are still exposed to 137 Cs because of the consumption of foodstuffs such as mushrooms and berries locally produced and contaminated as a result of a transfer of radionuclides from the soil, some authors attribute to radiation exposure a number of other illnesses exhibited in children living in contaminated territories, such as various infections, gastric symptoms or cardiovascular diseases, among cardiac arrhythmias that are frequently mentioned. 14 These authors state that such diseases would be caused by a chronic incorporation and heterogeneous accumulation of radioactive caesium inside the body, particularly into the myocardium. 11–14 However, there is no indication of an accumulation into the myocardium in a publication presenting an update of the biokinetic models for radiocaesium and its progeny as these radionuclides are known to be distributed mainly in the skeletal muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, arguing that children have been and are still exposed to 137 Cs because of the consumption of foodstuffs such as mushrooms and berries locally produced and contaminated as a result of a transfer of radionuclides from the soil, some authors attribute to radiation exposure a number of other illnesses exhibited in children living in contaminated territories, such as various infections, gastric symptoms or cardiovascular diseases, among cardiac arrhythmias that are frequently mentioned. 14 These authors state that such diseases would be caused by a chronic incorporation and heterogeneous accumulation of radioactive caesium inside the body, particularly into the myocardium. 11–14 However, there is no indication of an accumulation into the myocardium in a publication presenting an update of the biokinetic models for radiocaesium and its progeny as these radionuclides are known to be distributed mainly in the skeletal muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chernobyl region depends mainly on the characteristics of soil, climate, biosphere, plant species and populations (Yablokov et al, 2009).…”
Section: The Level Of Radionuclide Accumulation By Plants In Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radionuclides accumulate in tissues and bones and the most often can result into cancer (Burger and Lichtscheidl, 2019). It is known that health conditions of about seven million people have been in some way affected by Chernobyl and they suffer from numerous diseases as a direct consequence of radioisotope exposure (Yablokov et al, 2009;Ager et al, 2019).…”
Section: Chernobyl and Its Biological Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] In addition, SnCs can also contribute to IRinduced late effects, such as lung, kidney, intestinal, and skin fibrosis; cataract; cognitive dysfunction; and cardiovascular diseases. 6,[16][17][18][19][20][21] Therefore, cellular senescence is a doubleedged sword in the fight against cancer with RT. Inhibiting the induction of senescence is detrimental, but promoting SnC clearance after IR is beneficial (Fig.1).…”
Section: Cellular Senescence -A Double-edged Sword In the Fight Againmentioning
confidence: 99%