Handbook of Second Language Assessment 2016
DOI: 10.1515/9781614513827-017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

15. Assessment in educational settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts with the intermediate time behavior, where one faces an "entanglement barrier" [11,12] reminiscent of the generic linear growth of the entanglement entropy of a pure state after a quantum quench [13].In the late 2000s, the physical intuition that it could sometimes be more efficient to simulate the dynamics of operators -e.g. density matrices-rather than the one of pure states spurred another idea [8,[14][15][16][17]: that local observables in Heisenberg picture, O(t) = e iHt Oe −iHt , could also be approximated that way. In an insightful paper, Prosen andŽnidarič [8] observed numerically that there was a crucial distinction to be made between chaotic [18,19] and non-interacting dynamics: the bond dimension necessary for an MPO representation of O(t) was apparently blowing up exponentially with t in the former case and polynomially in the latter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This contrasts with the intermediate time behavior, where one faces an "entanglement barrier" [11,12] reminiscent of the generic linear growth of the entanglement entropy of a pure state after a quantum quench [13].In the late 2000s, the physical intuition that it could sometimes be more efficient to simulate the dynamics of operators -e.g. density matrices-rather than the one of pure states spurred another idea [8,[14][15][16][17]: that local observables in Heisenberg picture, O(t) = e iHt Oe −iHt , could also be approximated that way. In an insightful paper, Prosen andŽnidarič [8] observed numerically that there was a crucial distinction to be made between chaotic [18,19] and non-interacting dynamics: the bond dimension necessary for an MPO representation of O(t) was apparently blowing up exponentially with t in the former case and polynomially in the latter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In complete analogy with state entanglement, one defines the OE as S(O) ≡ − i λ i ln λ i . The OE was first introduced in the context of quantum information [20] and later connected to MPOsimulability of quantum dynamics [9,11,[14][15][16][17]21]. In the past months, there has been growing interest in the OE, both in condensed matter and in high-energy theory where it connects to quantum chaos, black holes, complexity and models of emergent spacetime [22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations