2015
DOI: 10.1093/pch/20.5.e87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

146: Validation of Parent-Reported Physical and Sedentary Activity by Accelerometry in Young Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the size of the sample, the caregiver-reported questionnaire was probably the most feasible and efficient approach for collecting data regarding children's PA or screen-viewing time, compared to using an accelerometer or a passive sensing technology-measured approach, although the limitation of this approach is fully recognized. Nevertheless, the use of a questionnaire is supported by other studies (Berglind & Tynelius, 2018;Sarker et al, 2015) which state that the parent-report may be a valid measure of physical activity and screen time for children. It must be noted that the options for answers could have been over-simplified by simply allowing for a Yes or No response, and this may have led to the loss of valuable information.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, due to the size of the sample, the caregiver-reported questionnaire was probably the most feasible and efficient approach for collecting data regarding children's PA or screen-viewing time, compared to using an accelerometer or a passive sensing technology-measured approach, although the limitation of this approach is fully recognized. Nevertheless, the use of a questionnaire is supported by other studies (Berglind & Tynelius, 2018;Sarker et al, 2015) which state that the parent-report may be a valid measure of physical activity and screen time for children. It must be noted that the options for answers could have been over-simplified by simply allowing for a Yes or No response, and this may have led to the loss of valuable information.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%