2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

14 new eclipsing white dwarf plus main-sequence binaries from the SDSS and Catalina surveys

Abstract: We report on the search for new eclipsing white dwarf plus main-sequence (WDMS) binaries in the light curves of the Catalina surveys. We use a colour selected list of almost 2000 candidate WDMS systems from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, specifically designed to identify WDMS systems with cool white dwarfs and/or early M type main-sequence stars. We identify a total of 17 eclipsing systems, 14 of which are new discoveries. We also find 3 candidate eclipsing systems, 2 main-sequence eclipsing binaries and 22 non… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The close binaries discovered in the above described project containing M4-M6 secondary stars with orbital periods measured through RVs or from ellipsoidal/reflection effect (25) are complemented with 22 eclipsing systems identified by combining our spectroscopic WD+MS identification from SDSS with photometry from archival Catalina Sky Survey data (Drake et al 2010;Parsons et al 2013aParsons et al , 2015. This way we established a sample of 47 PCEBs with an orbital period below 10 h and companions with spectral types M4-M6.…”
Section: Systems From the Sdss Pceb Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The close binaries discovered in the above described project containing M4-M6 secondary stars with orbital periods measured through RVs or from ellipsoidal/reflection effect (25) are complemented with 22 eclipsing systems identified by combining our spectroscopic WD+MS identification from SDSS with photometry from archival Catalina Sky Survey data (Drake et al 2010;Parsons et al 2013aParsons et al , 2015. This way we established a sample of 47 PCEBs with an orbital period below 10 h and companions with spectral types M4-M6.…”
Section: Systems From the Sdss Pceb Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include for example: constraining current theories of close compact binary evolution (Davis, Kolb & Willems 2010;Zorotovic et al 2010Zorotovic et al , 2011aRebassa-Mansergas et al 2012b); demonstrating in a robust way that the majority of low-mass white dwarfs are formed in binaries (Rebassa-Mansergas et al 2011); constraining the pairing properties of main-sequence stars (Ferrario 2012); providing robust observational evidence for disrupted magnetic braking ; constraining the rotationage-activity relation of low-mass main-sequence stars (RebassaMansergas, Schreiber & Gänsicke 2013a); studying the statistical properties of the PCEB population using Monte Carlo techniques (Toonen & Nelemans 2013;Camacho et al 2014;Zorotovic et al 2014); analysing why the average mass of white dwarfs in cataclysmic variables is significantly larger than the average mass of single white dwarfs (Zorotovic, Schreiber & Gänsicke 2011b;Nelemans et al 2016;Schreiber, Zorotovic & Wijnen 2016); testing hierarchical probabilistic models used to infer properties of unseen companions to low-mass white dwarfs (Andrews, Price-Whelan & Agüeros 2014); detecting new gravitational wave verification sources (Kilic et al 2014); analysing the interior structural effects of common envelope evolution on low-mass pulsating white dwarfs (Hermes et al 2015). In addition, many eclipsing SDSS PCEBs have been identified (Nebot Gómez-Morán et al 2009;Pyrzas et al 2009Pyrzas et al , 2012Parsons et al 2013Parsons et al , 2015 which are being used to test theoretical mass-radius relations of both white dwarfs and lowmass main-sequence stars (Parsons et al 2012b,a), as well as the existence of circumbinary planets (Zorotovic & Schreiber 2013;Marsh et al 2014;Parsons et al 2014).…”
Section: The Sdss Wdms Binary Cataloguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the same approach detailed in Parsons et al (2013) and Parsons et al (2015) whereby we selected all WDMS binaries with magnitudes of r < 19 and re-reduced the raw CSS data ourselves to more easily identify very deeply eclipsing systems and remove any contaminated exposures. Out of the 1177 and 91 WDMS binaries and candidates identified here, only 314 were bright enough and with sufficient coverage to search for eclipses, i.e.…”
Section: E C L I P S I N G W D M S B I Na R I E Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years the number of such systems known has ⋆ steven.parsons@uv.cl dramatically increased, thanks mainly to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS, York et al 2000;Adelman-McCarthy et al 2008;Abazajian et al 2009), which has lead to the discovery of more than 2000 white dwarf plus main-sequence systems (Rebassa-Mansergas et al 2013a), from which more than 200 close, post common-envelope binaries (PCEBs) have been identified (Nebot Gómez-Morán et al 2011;Parsons et al 2013bParsons et al , 2015. Among this sample are 71 eclipsing binaries (see the appendix of Parsons et al 2015 for a recent census).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among this sample are 71 eclipsing binaries (see the appendix of Parsons et al 2015 for a recent census). These are extremely useful systems for high precision stellar parameter studies, since the small size of the white dwarf leads to very sharp eclipse profiles, allowing radius measurements to a precision of better than two per cent (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%