2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

14-3-3 CSF levels in sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease differ across molecular subtypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
32
1
23

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
32
1
23
Order By: Relevance
“…As tau is a marker of neurodegeneration, it seems reasonable to consider the speed of neuronal loss as a molecular equivalent of disease progression rates; however, other neuropathological processes like astrogliosis, PrP deposition or plaque formation might also play a role. Subtypespecific findings attributable to different rates of disease progression have been described in a similar way for proteins 14-3-3 and MRI profiles (Gmitterova, et al, 2009); however, these findings have not been transferred to clinical practice, because 14-3-3 ELISA results are not commonly available and MRI profile differentiation needs expert radiological rating. Total tau, on the other hand, is a widely available test which can also be applied in resource-poor settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As tau is a marker of neurodegeneration, it seems reasonable to consider the speed of neuronal loss as a molecular equivalent of disease progression rates; however, other neuropathological processes like astrogliosis, PrP deposition or plaque formation might also play a role. Subtypespecific findings attributable to different rates of disease progression have been described in a similar way for proteins 14-3-3 and MRI profiles (Gmitterova, et al, 2009); however, these findings have not been transferred to clinical practice, because 14-3-3 ELISA results are not commonly available and MRI profile differentiation needs expert radiological rating. Total tau, on the other hand, is a widely available test which can also be applied in resource-poor settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of one classic marker of neurodegeneration, protein 14-3-3, have been shown to differ between molecular subtypes when using a 14-3-3 ELISA (Gmitterova, et al, 2009). However, as 14-3-3 is routinely assessed in a binary way by Western Blot (resulting in high positivity rates for all subtypes and no detection of quantitative differences), 14-3-3 has not been adopted in clinical practice in order to differentiate between subtypes during life-time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that many factors impact prion disease biomarker appearance including disease strain, subtype, duration, age at onset, and timing of lumbar puncture [7,32–40]. For example, when 70 sCJD cases with distinct molecular subtypes were evaluated for 14-3-3 using ELISA, the most elevated levels of 14-3-3 were observed in classical molecular subtypes (MM1), and lower levels were observed with less common subtypes (MV2, MM2) with longer durations and atypical presentations of CJD [41]. CSF biomarkers in sCJD have been tracked over the clinical course of disease [42,43] but have not been examined during the preclinical asymptomatic phase of the disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most widely used surrogate protein markers are brain derived CSF proteins (14-3-3, t-PrP, total (t)-tau and t-tau/phosphorylated (p)-tau ratio) with different level of specificity and sensitivity for differential diagnosis of CJD from other rapidly progressive dementias [8,18,20,[39][40][41][42][43]. While many studies have analysed utility of these biomarkers for differential diagnosis, only few studies have particularly analysed the effect of the disease-subtypes on the specificity and sensitivity of the biomarkers [23,24,44]. Recently, we showed that CSF protein analysis (14-3-3, tau protein, phosphorylated tau (181P) (p-tau) protein, amyloid β1-42, S100B and NSE can be used as a marker for pre-mortem diagnosis of sCJD subtypes when genotype of codon 129 is known [44,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many studies have analysed utility of these biomarkers for differential diagnosis, only few studies have particularly analysed the effect of the disease-subtypes on the specificity and sensitivity of the biomarkers [23,24,44]. Recently, we showed that CSF protein analysis (14-3-3, tau protein, phosphorylated tau (181P) (p-tau) protein, amyloid β1-42, S100B and NSE can be used as a marker for pre-mortem diagnosis of sCJD subtypes when genotype of codon 129 is known [44,45]. Authors have reported significantly high tau levels in PrP type 1 patient with MM and MV genotype but lower in VV cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%