1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(97)89417-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

138 Gemcitabine in the treatment of pretreated metastatic non small cell lung cancer: A preliminary report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study and in other studies in pretreated patients (Crinó et al, 1997a;Guerra et al, 1997;Piazza et al, 1997;Rosvold et al, 1998), single-agent gemcitabine as second-line therapy produced an overall response rate of approximately 20%, which is similar to response rates observed in single-agent gemcitabine studies in untreated patients, who are not cross-resistant with other agents commonly used in this setting. Given an appropriate regimen, gemcitabine is considered to interact synergistically with cisplatin to enhance its cytotoxicity as evidenced by the clinical results observed in first-line treatment with gemcitabine-cisplatin combination regimens producing response rates of 30-50% (Abratt et al, 1997;Crinó et al, 1997b;Einhorn, 1997;Shepherd et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In this study and in other studies in pretreated patients (Crinó et al, 1997a;Guerra et al, 1997;Piazza et al, 1997;Rosvold et al, 1998), single-agent gemcitabine as second-line therapy produced an overall response rate of approximately 20%, which is similar to response rates observed in single-agent gemcitabine studies in untreated patients, who are not cross-resistant with other agents commonly used in this setting. Given an appropriate regimen, gemcitabine is considered to interact synergistically with cisplatin to enhance its cytotoxicity as evidenced by the clinical results observed in first-line treatment with gemcitabine-cisplatin combination regimens producing response rates of 30-50% (Abratt et al, 1997;Crinó et al, 1997b;Einhorn, 1997;Shepherd et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%