2017
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311726.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

136 Gp auscultation for diagnosing valvular heart disease

Abstract: recorded were age, gender, number of blood cultures taken and the final diagnosis stated in the discharge summary. Results 112 episodes were identified in 72 females and 40 males (mean age 40 years, range<1-97). The mean number of blood cultures was 2.57 (range1-12) and 85 (76%) patients had only one blood culture taken. The infections recorded are shown in Figure 1. The cause of the bacteraemia was not stated in 33 (29.5%) cases. Community acquired pneumonia (n=31) was the commonest infection, followed by cat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AS could be detected in approximately half of those patients (8 of 18 patients; 44.4%), confirming the low sensitivity and specificity of auscultation with regard to detecting VHD. 23 Nevertheless, our data indicate a significant opportunity to identify patients with AS based on cardiac auscultation, as a positive auscultation finding would have a 20% likelihood of identifying a patient with mild or moderate AS (30 patients with a murmur, resulting in 13 referrals with a 44.5% likelihood of AS detection). In the majority of subjects where either a referral decision was taken or where subjects were supposed to be further reviewed within practice, a murmur was detected (15 of 20 patients), indicating that auscultation results were most likely the main driver for a referral decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…AS could be detected in approximately half of those patients (8 of 18 patients; 44.4%), confirming the low sensitivity and specificity of auscultation with regard to detecting VHD. 23 Nevertheless, our data indicate a significant opportunity to identify patients with AS based on cardiac auscultation, as a positive auscultation finding would have a 20% likelihood of identifying a patient with mild or moderate AS (30 patients with a murmur, resulting in 13 referrals with a 44.5% likelihood of AS detection). In the majority of subjects where either a referral decision was taken or where subjects were supposed to be further reviewed within practice, a murmur was detected (15 of 20 patients), indicating that auscultation results were most likely the main driver for a referral decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Myerson et al found similar results in their 2017 study of unselected and asymptomatic participants aged 65 or older with no previous VHD diagnosis, where GPs identified significant VHD (moderate to severe regurgitation or at least mild stenosis) with AUC of only 0.5635 .Clinical ImplicationsThe fact that AS was detected reliably in a cohort representative of the general population has promising health care implications. AS, whether it is asymptomatic or not, is associated with poor prognosis when left untreated, and presence of symptoms are not reliable indicators of disease-severity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…2a). Despite its limitations with regards to sensitivity and specificity to diagnose valvular heart disease, chest auscultation represents an important diagnostic measure to support the diagnosis of suspected aortic valve stenosis [16,17]. Recently published data confirm a low rate of auscultation in Europe and therefore suggest that a significant proportion of patients with aortic valve stenosis may not be referred for echocardiography [11,18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%