2009
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(12)72520-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

133 Acute Side Effects of Capecitabine Compared to 5fu for Concurrent Chemoradiation of Rectal Cancer: A 5-Year Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, the question is why short-course chemoradiation has produced such a good result. There are several reasons that could explain the more favorable results in this study; firstly, the precise delineation of target volumes based on international guidelines [14] and the strict confirmation of treatment plans, considering the sufficient coverage of PTV and also the dose of organs-at-risk; second, administration of capecitabine with radiotherapy instead of bolus 5FU is shown to be associated with fewer toxicities and higher response rates in a study by Haddad et al [30]; third, prolonging the interval between radiotherapy completion and surgery to more than 8 weeks, as this has been demonstrated by Rega et al [31] to reduce adverse events and increase response to neoadjuvant therapy. In our study, the interval from end of radiotherapy to surgery was higher compared with the majority of other similar studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…So, the question is why short-course chemoradiation has produced such a good result. There are several reasons that could explain the more favorable results in this study; firstly, the precise delineation of target volumes based on international guidelines [14] and the strict confirmation of treatment plans, considering the sufficient coverage of PTV and also the dose of organs-at-risk; second, administration of capecitabine with radiotherapy instead of bolus 5FU is shown to be associated with fewer toxicities and higher response rates in a study by Haddad et al [30]; third, prolonging the interval between radiotherapy completion and surgery to more than 8 weeks, as this has been demonstrated by Rega et al [31] to reduce adverse events and increase response to neoadjuvant therapy. In our study, the interval from end of radiotherapy to surgery was higher compared with the majority of other similar studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%