2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

13-Year Experience of Carpal Tunnel Release Using the Indiana Tome Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35 Comparative operative time using the mini-open and endoscopic techniques is controversial and may be surgeon dependent. 25,31 Improvements in disability are equivalent between the open and endoscopic approaches at 3-month, 5-year, and 12-year follow-up. [2][3][4] Review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database from 2003 to 2013 found the complication rate of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release to be 3.6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 Comparative operative time using the mini-open and endoscopic techniques is controversial and may be surgeon dependent. 25,31 Improvements in disability are equivalent between the open and endoscopic approaches at 3-month, 5-year, and 12-year follow-up. [2][3][4] Review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database from 2003 to 2013 found the complication rate of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release to be 3.6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…10,12,18,26 Carpal tunnel release is routinely performed via the traditional open approach, mini-open approach, or endoscopic approach with high rates of success. 5,6,23,25,30,32,35 There is controversy between the relative merits of the three surgical approaches. The traditional open approach, although safe from a structural standpoint, 24,35 is associated with scar tenderness, pillar pain, burning discomfort, and a longer time to return to work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial data from a clinical trial suggested an iatrogenic median nerve injury rate of zero using the Agee method (Agee et al, 1992), yet statistics from a study by Schonauer et al (2003) suggest injury in 0.53% of cases. Both endoscopic procedures include the risk of the learning curve associated with the surgical equipment as well as the possibility of converting the endoscopic technique into an open technique when complications arise, many of which are associated with anatomical variations of the median nerve (Lee et al, 2008; Schonauer et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other minimally invasive carpal tunnel release tools such as the Indiana Tome (Biomet, Warsaw, USA), the KnifeLight (Stryker Instruments, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA), and the "Safeguard" system (KMI, Inc., San Diego, USA) have been developed to minimize incision and soft tissue damage [12,27]. With limited literature, a review of minimally invasive carpal tunnel release with these assistive tools demonstrated an early recovery outcome and minimal complication [12,28,29]. However, unlike the Wongsiri MIS technique, those surgeons had a limited visual field during operation and because of this limitation, instances occurred of incomplete TCL release and could not demonstrate effective safety along the compressed area of median nerve [7,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e major noteworthy complications of endoscopic carpal tunnel release are nerve injury, which include transient nerve problem and nerve transection [6,11]. In contrast, other minimally invasive techniques with limited visualization, with and/or without special tools such as the Indiana Tome (Biomet, Warsaw, USA), the KnifeLight (Stryker Instruments, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA), and the "Safeguard" system (KMI, Inc., San Diego, USA) have individually shown simplified operative techniques but each also has a limited visual field, and notably, some literature describes safety risks and evidence of incomplete transverse carpal ligament (TCL) release [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%