2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.1579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1265P IMpower150: A post hoc analysis of efficacy outcomes in patients with KRAS, STK11 and KEAP1 mutations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several retrospective studies of patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC compared outcomes of patients with KRAS and STK11 co-mutations with outcomes of patients with only an STK11 mutation. In these studies, patients with the co-mutations had poorer outcomes [63][64][65][66][67]. In an analysis from IMpower150, STK11 was shown to be a major driver of primary resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade in patients with KRAS mutations [64][65][66]68].…”
Section: Co-mutations Of Special Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several retrospective studies of patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC compared outcomes of patients with KRAS and STK11 co-mutations with outcomes of patients with only an STK11 mutation. In these studies, patients with the co-mutations had poorer outcomes [63][64][65][66][67]. In an analysis from IMpower150, STK11 was shown to be a major driver of primary resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade in patients with KRAS mutations [64][65][66]68].…”
Section: Co-mutations Of Special Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an analysis from IMpower150, STK11 was shown to be a major driver of primary resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade in patients with KRAS mutations [64][65][66]68]. In this study, median OS in patients with KRAS, STK11, and/or KEAP1 mutations who received the combination of atezolizumab, J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f bevacizumab, and chemotherapy was 11.1 months, as compared with 8.67 months in those receiving the combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy (HR for death, 0.50); PFS in the 2 groups was 6 and 3.35 months, respectively [64,67].…”
Section: Co-mutations Of Special Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, for KRAS G12C mutations, OS HR was 1.14 (95% CI: 0.45-2.92) [22]. In the IM-POWER150 study, in the population with KRAS mutations, ABCP showed more benefit in OS and PFS than ACP or BCP; in the KRAS-WT population, comparing with BCP, the improvement in OS of ABCP or ACP was limited [23].…”
Section: Anti-pd-l(1) Combined Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The relationship between VEGF and KRAS has been identified in previous studies, which showed that VEGF was upregulated by oncogenic KRAS [ 72 , 73 ] and that VEGF promoter activity was upregulated by activation of the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway [ 74 ]. Of note, a recent clinical study demonstrated that the addition of the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab to a regimen including the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (ABCP) produced longer progression-free survival and a greater overall survival benefit than atezolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (ACP), or bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (BCP), in patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC with KRAS mutations [ 75 ]. Moreover, a greater survival benefit was achieved with ABCP compared with ACP or BCP in patients with tumors carrying KRAS / LKB1 / KEAP1 comutations.…”
Section: Oncogenic Kras Regulates the Tumor Microenvironment (Tme)mentioning
confidence: 99%