“…In order to avoid unnecessary exposure to the risk of hemorrhagic complications due to anticoag ulant treatment [4], the need for confirma tive diagnosis by objective methods is widely accepted. The gold standard for the diagno sis of DVT, contrast venography [5], is an invasive, often painful and expensive tech nique that requires special expertise [6], Therefore several noninvasive alternatives have been developed, of which impedance plethysmography (IPG) [7][8][9][10], ultrasonog raphy [11,12] and l25I-fibrinogen leg scan ning [13] have extensively been evaluated. IPG has shown to be a practical noninvasive alternative for the diagnosis of proximal DVT of the leg in outpatients [8][9][10], In the past, laboratory assays have also been inves tigated to establish their potential role in the diagnosis of DVT [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], Most of these assays were based upon the idea that the presence of products in the circulation, re sulting from plasmin-mediated lysis of fibrin(ogen), might be a useful marker of the thrombotic event.…”