2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.105971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1200 years of Upper Missouri River streamflow reconstructed from tree rings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these 28 predictors, 5 are located relatively distant (~670 km) to the watershed. We retained these 5 predictors as they contributed additional model skill, as is commonly found in tree-ring hydroclimate and streamflow reconstructions 31,[45][46][47][48][49][50] , consistent with spatial autocorrelation in climate fields [51][52][53] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Of these 28 predictors, 5 are located relatively distant (~670 km) to the watershed. We retained these 5 predictors as they contributed additional model skill, as is commonly found in tree-ring hydroclimate and streamflow reconstructions 31,[45][46][47][48][49][50] , consistent with spatial autocorrelation in climate fields [51][52][53] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The data at 319 of these sites were downloaded from the International Tree Ring Data Bank (ITRDB; https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo-search/?dataTypeId=18, January 2017), whereas the data of an additional 630 sites were directly contributed by the tree‐ring community and co‐authors. Similar to the ITRDB, the sampling schemes underlying this second collection ranged from elevation gradient (Anderegg & HilleRisLambers, 2019; Case & Peterson, 2005; Guiterman, 2016; Littell, Peterson, & Tjoelker, 2008; Restaino, Peterson, & Littell, 2016) and gridded designs (O'Connor, Falk, Lynch, & Swetnam, 2014) to targeted sampling for dendroclimatological or ‐entomological reconstructions (e.g., Allen et al., 2013; Martin et al., 2019; Razavi, Elshorbagy, Wheater, & Sauchyn, 2015; Ryerson, Swetnam, & Lynch, 2003; Swetnam & Lynch, 1989). We also included 2,617 tree‐ring time series from 1,750 permanent forest inventory plots of the U.S. Forest Service Interior West‐Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program, which is presently the most extensive systematically sampled tree‐ring collection in the region (DeRose, Shaw, & Long, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the relationships between winter and spring precipitation and water year streamflow in a long‐term context, a set of tree‐ring‐based reconstructions was employed. Reconstructions exist for water year streamflow at Toston (Martin et al, 2019), 1 April SWE (Pederson, Gray, Woodhouse, et al, 2011), and warm season (June–August) temperature for the Missouri River Headwaters (Kipfmueller, 2008), but no reconstruction exists for spring precipitation. To assess the contribution of spring precipitation to runoff, a reconstruction of spring precipitation for the Missouri River Headwaters subbasin was developed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing reconstructions of streamflow and 1 April SWE were used with the spring precipitation reconstruction developed for this study to evaluate long‐term hydroclimatic relationships in the Missouri River Headwaters. The reconstruction of estimated natural streamflow of the Missouri River at Toston from Martin et al (2019) spans 679–2008 CE. The years 1376–1998 were used for this study, and over this period, the reconstruction explains approximately 70% of the variance in the gauge record.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%