2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6sm01153e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

111 years of Brownian motion

Abstract: We consider the Brownian motion of a particle and present a tutorial review over the last 111 years since Einstein’s paper in 1905. We describe Einstein’s model, Langevin’s model and the hydrodynamic models, with increasing sophistication on the hydrodynamic interactions between the particle and the fluid. In recent years, the effects of interfaces on the nearby Brownian motion have been the focus of several investigations. We summarize various results and discuss some of the controversies associated with new … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
143
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
2
143
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The self-diffusion coefficient of a colloidal particle is usually equal to k B T divided by the drag coefficient (Sutherland 1905;Einstein 1905), where k B is the Boltzmann constant and T is the temperature of the fluid. This relation (Einsten's relation) can be derived from a linear Langevin equation for the particle velocity even if it is generalized to have the memory kernel representing the back-flow effect (Zwanzig & Bixon 1970;Widom 1971;Case 1971;Kubo et al 1991;Bian et al 2016). A Brownian particle has been used experimentally as a probe for local environments in the field of microrheology (Brau et al 2007;Pesce et al 2009;Kimura 2009;Bertseva et al 2012;Grebenkov et al 2013;Domínguez-García et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self-diffusion coefficient of a colloidal particle is usually equal to k B T divided by the drag coefficient (Sutherland 1905;Einstein 1905), where k B is the Boltzmann constant and T is the temperature of the fluid. This relation (Einsten's relation) can be derived from a linear Langevin equation for the particle velocity even if it is generalized to have the memory kernel representing the back-flow effect (Zwanzig & Bixon 1970;Widom 1971;Case 1971;Kubo et al 1991;Bian et al 2016). A Brownian particle has been used experimentally as a probe for local environments in the field of microrheology (Brau et al 2007;Pesce et al 2009;Kimura 2009;Bertseva et al 2012;Grebenkov et al 2013;Domínguez-García et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that crossovers between diffusive regimes can also be described by generalized Langevin equations [67] and fractional (with the Riemann-Liouville operator) Kramers equations [19], among other approaches [68,69]. In particular, the usual Langevin equation [70] predicts a crossover between ballistic and usual diffusion, which has been experimentally observed only in 2011 [71]. However, the diffusion equation in terms of these new operators lead to these crossovers without explicitly considering external forces, inertial effects, and reaction terms.…”
Section: Diffusion and Fractional Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent microscopic measurements, as well as large scale numerical simulations, have begun to focus on the start-up of steady shear flow and have clearly documented the evolution of particulate level microstructure under deformation [8,18,22,39,45,47,48]. The wide range of time and length scales accessible by DPD simulations, coupled with inclusion of hydrodynamic interactions between particles [25,49], now enables systematic exploration of the evolution of microstructural and rheological properties for TEVP materials as well as validation of empirical constitutive equations proposed for such systems [21,[50][51][52][53].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%