2019
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez058.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

110. classification Criteria for the Anca-Associated Vasculitides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
35
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnosis of EGPA has been a controversial topic over the years in terms of whether pathology with biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis or whether a clinical diagnosis based on the presence of syndromic components is sufficient [82]. Several groups have developed diagnostic criteria for EGPA, including the Chapel Hill, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and Lanham criteria [81,83,84]; however, the phase 3 mepolizumab clinical trial diverged from these standards, defining EGPA by the presence of asthma and eosinophilia (>1000 cells•µL −1 and/or >10% of leukocytes) in addition to at least two of the following: positive biopsy findings (eosinophilic vasculitis, perivascular eosinophilic infiltration, eosinophil-rich granulomatous inflammation), neuropathy (mononeuritis multiplex or polyneuropathy), non-fixed pulmonary infiltrates, sinonasal abnormality (rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps), cardiomyopathy, glomerulonephritis, alveolar haemorrhage, palpable purpura, or a positive test for ANCA (myeloperoxidase or proteinase 3) [85]. A positive ANCA test is not mandatory and is present in only a subset (approximately 35-40%) of patients with EGPA [82].…”
Section: Eosinophils and Other Airway Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of EGPA has been a controversial topic over the years in terms of whether pathology with biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis or whether a clinical diagnosis based on the presence of syndromic components is sufficient [82]. Several groups have developed diagnostic criteria for EGPA, including the Chapel Hill, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and Lanham criteria [81,83,84]; however, the phase 3 mepolizumab clinical trial diverged from these standards, defining EGPA by the presence of asthma and eosinophilia (>1000 cells•µL −1 and/or >10% of leukocytes) in addition to at least two of the following: positive biopsy findings (eosinophilic vasculitis, perivascular eosinophilic infiltration, eosinophil-rich granulomatous inflammation), neuropathy (mononeuritis multiplex or polyneuropathy), non-fixed pulmonary infiltrates, sinonasal abnormality (rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps), cardiomyopathy, glomerulonephritis, alveolar haemorrhage, palpable purpura, or a positive test for ANCA (myeloperoxidase or proteinase 3) [85]. A positive ANCA test is not mandatory and is present in only a subset (approximately 35-40%) of patients with EGPA [82].…”
Section: Eosinophils and Other Airway Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…За поставяне на диагноза EGPA пациентите трябва да отговарят на определени критерии, фигуриращи в поне една от препоръките на: Американски Колегиум по ревматология (American College of Rheumatology, ACR) за грануломатозен полиангиит (1990), консенсусната конференция от Chapel Hill за номенклатура на васкулитите (Chapel Hill Consensus Conference, CHCC) (1994, 2012) и алгоритъма на Европейската агенция по лекарствата (European Medical Agency, EMA) (2007) [7][8][9][10]. През 2017 г. пред ACR и Европейската Лига срещу Ревматизма (European League Against Rheumatism, EULAR) са предложени нови класификационни критерии за първичните системни васкулити, предоставящи 85% сензитивност и 99% специфичност за диагностициране на EGPA [7,11,12].…”
Section: въведениеunclassified
“…EGPA не се наблюдава често при деца и юноши. В тази възрастова група заболяването има по-агресивен ход, с изразена белодробна и сърдечносъдова манифестация [12]. Не се отбелязват фамилност или етнически различия в появата и развитието на EGPA.…”
Section: обобщениепидемиологичниданниотOrphanetидруги публикацииunclassified
“…With these criteria, both clinical and laboratory parameters, including ANCA testing and imaging study findings, are considered, and a different weight or score is applied to each criterion. Nodules, masses, or cavitations on chest images; and inflammation, consolidation, or effusion of the nasal or paranasal sinuses are among the imaging findings (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%