2009
DOI: 10.14361/9783839411551-011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

11. Verfahren der lexikometrischen Analyse von Textkorpora

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First , within Neue Kulturgeographie , a dose of ‘Kittler’ might have softened the discourse school’s strong interest in the method of textual analysis, e.g. lexicometric methods, argument analysis and coding (Dzudzek et al., 2009; Glasze et al., 2009; Mattissek, 2009) rather than the material conditions of possibility for the circulation of these discourses that Kittler was interested in. Instead, the discourse school resisted for a significant time the non-representational, actor-network and posthumanist approaches that were and still are discussed in Anglophone geography.…”
Section: To Read What Was Never Writtenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First , within Neue Kulturgeographie , a dose of ‘Kittler’ might have softened the discourse school’s strong interest in the method of textual analysis, e.g. lexicometric methods, argument analysis and coding (Dzudzek et al., 2009; Glasze et al., 2009; Mattissek, 2009) rather than the material conditions of possibility for the circulation of these discourses that Kittler was interested in. Instead, the discourse school resisted for a significant time the non-representational, actor-network and posthumanist approaches that were and still are discussed in Anglophone geography.…”
Section: To Read What Was Never Writtenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les combinaisons répétées de formes lexicales dessinent un réseau de significations contingent et mouvant, au sein duquel les différents signifiants utilisés (les mots) sont dotés de signification seulement par leur interrelation avec les autres (Dzudzek et al, 2009). La compréhension de ce réseau contingent passe dans un premier temps par la mise en évidence des termes qui « s'entre-définissent », et dans un second temps par la mise en évidence des relations (équivalence, opposition, temporalité, causalité, ou bien ambivalences) qui les unissent.…”
Section: ____________________________________________________________unclassified