Tone and Inflection 2016
DOI: 10.1515/9783110452754-011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

11. Tracing the emergence of inflectional tone in Cuicatec

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inflectional marking by tone includes TAM and negation, while derivational marking can code the passive, causative, applicative and reciprocal verb forms. A further distinction for morphological tone is that it may be replacive or additive (Feist & Palancar 2016). Clearly, the Sinitic perfective tone change discussed above is inflectional and replacive of the tone on the verb stem.…”
Section: Crosslinguistic Comparison: a Brief Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inflectional marking by tone includes TAM and negation, while derivational marking can code the passive, causative, applicative and reciprocal verb forms. A further distinction for morphological tone is that it may be replacive or additive (Feist & Palancar 2016). Clearly, the Sinitic perfective tone change discussed above is inflectional and replacive of the tone on the verb stem.…”
Section: Crosslinguistic Comparison: a Brief Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…above, research on the morphological use of tone in East and Southeast Asian languages is at an early stage. Lexical tone is intimately linked to the segmental morpheme such that few languages in this region reveal the kind of tone contours and tone spreading found in many Bantu and other languages of Africa (cf Hyman 2014), nor the complex tone patterns of Oto-Manguean languages of Central America, such as Cuicatec (Feist & Palancar 2016). Yet, despite the differing typological profiles of the aforementioned languages vis-à-vis Sinitic, these analyses point to the fact that the pathways of evolution for morphological tone we have proposed in the preceding sections are not specific to Sinitic languages.…”
Section: Crosslinguistic Comparison: a Brief Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…INALI () lists three varieties, which Kaufman (: 120) considers a single language. Longacre () deals with Cuicatec historical phonology in some detail, and though a lengthy bilingual dictionary (Anderson & Concepción Roque, ) and a few descriptive works exist (Bradley, ; Davis & Walker, ; Feist & Palancar, ; Needham & Davis, ), Cuicatec remains one of the least documented and described Otomanguean subgroups.…”
Section: Mixtecan: Trique Cuicatec and Mixtecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por ejemplo, deberá reanalizarse la propuesta tonal de este trabajo en contextos más amplios como frases marco, oraciones y habla libre; describir la función flexiva del tono (cf. el análisis del cuicateco de Santa María Pápalo en Feist & Palancar 2016), así como buscar respuestas en variables extralingüísticas para poder corroborar dicha afirmación (San Giacomo 2016a).…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified