2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(14)60984-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1001 The impact of re-TUR on clinical outcomes in a large cohort of t1g3 patients treated with BCG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Macroscopically complete resection of bladder tumours, as well as the presence of muscle in the specimens was confirmed in all cases in order to be included in the study. Recently, Gontero et al [37] showed, in a cohort of 2530 primary T1G3, that re-TUR in the presence of muscle in the primary specimen does not improve the outcome for recurrence-, progression-, and cancer-specific survival after adjusting for prognostic factors. Moreover, the relatively low short-and intermediate-term recurrence and progression rates supported the validity of our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macroscopically complete resection of bladder tumours, as well as the presence of muscle in the specimens was confirmed in all cases in order to be included in the study. Recently, Gontero et al [37] showed, in a cohort of 2530 primary T1G3, that re-TUR in the presence of muscle in the primary specimen does not improve the outcome for recurrence-, progression-, and cancer-specific survival after adjusting for prognostic factors. Moreover, the relatively low short-and intermediate-term recurrence and progression rates supported the validity of our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Although other authors found a lower incidence and much lower understaging, they already advocated re-TURBT practice more selectively. 34 Recently, Gontero et al 35 in a series of more than 2500 patients with urothelial carcinoma T1G3 have confirmed that the re-TURBT only had a positive impact on recurrence, progression, and overall survival if there was no representation of muscle in the initial piece of TUR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both randomised trials and population-based data have confirmed the beneficial effect of SLR on recurrence, progression and death from bladder cancer [4][5][6]. Recently, however, a large retrospective study found no effect of SLR on recurrence, progression or death from bladder cancer if detrusor muscle was present at the primary resection [7].…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, RV and RTV might be used as markers to monitor the quality of the TUR to improve treatment outcome. therefore we could not study this important factor for tumour recurrence and progression as has previously been done in many investigations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, provided detrusor muscle is present in the TUR specimen, SLR might not be necessary [7].…”
Section: The Quality Of the Primary Resectionmentioning
confidence: 98%