Abstract:A radical transformation of the global energy system is underway. Solar photovoltaics and wind now comprise three-quarters of the global net new electricity-generation-capacity additions because they are cheap. The deep renewable electrification of energy services including transport, heating and industry will allow solar and wind to largely eliminate fossil fuels over the next few decades. This paper demonstrates that Nepal will be able to achieve energy self-sufficiency during the twenty-first century. Nepal… Show more
“…There are also limited prospects for small-scale wind turbines in some suitable locations. Various international donors, as well as other relevant stakeholders, are working to support small-scale wind energy (Lohani & Blakers, 2021). A large wind-solar hybrid This effort will aid in the estimation of updated wind power potential in Nepal.…”
Section: Wind Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, energy security in the country can likely only be realized when threats to the hydropower sector are mitigated via diversification of the energy mix, and where balancing across generation sources is achieved. Lohani and Blakers (2021) discussed a 100% RE scenario with pumped hydro energy storage (PHES) in Nepal (Lohani & Blakers, 2021). That study discussed the potential of solar generation and the energy balancing possibilities provided by off-river PHES, in light of the potential effects of climate change on Himalayan-based rivers, as well as the social and environmental threats from hydropower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical potential of hydropower in the country reaches about 83,000 MW, of which roughly 42,000 MW are considered economically viable(Program, 2018). Yet this is rather minuscule compared to the theoretical solar PV potential.Furthermore, land and environmental concerns caused by flooding at or near dam sites are common negative consequences of hydro projects(Lohani & Blakers, 2021). An additional concern is thatNepal lacks a diversified energy mix due to the current dominance of hydropower.…”
The energy mix in Nepal is currently dominated by the traditional and inefficient use of biomass (66.54%) and fossil fuels (27.24%), and energy poverty remains extremely high. This paper reviews relevant literature to provide an overview of the current renewable energy status and energy mix in Nepal, and to discuss prospects for the country to achieve a sustainable energy transition. Nepal-specific papers from peerreviewed sources and other agency and academic reports were included insofar as these discussed renewable energy and provided recommendations for policy-making on sustainable energy and related development goals. Despite the rapidly falling cost of solar photovoltaic, the share of modern renewable energy in Nepal is currently less than 3%. On this basis, and given the country's sustainable energy goals, we conclude that favorable and aggressive policies and strategies are needed to support adoption of clean energy in Nepal, comprised of a high share of solar generation equipped with battery storage, and balanced with storage such as off-river pumped hydropower technology.
“…There are also limited prospects for small-scale wind turbines in some suitable locations. Various international donors, as well as other relevant stakeholders, are working to support small-scale wind energy (Lohani & Blakers, 2021). A large wind-solar hybrid This effort will aid in the estimation of updated wind power potential in Nepal.…”
Section: Wind Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, energy security in the country can likely only be realized when threats to the hydropower sector are mitigated via diversification of the energy mix, and where balancing across generation sources is achieved. Lohani and Blakers (2021) discussed a 100% RE scenario with pumped hydro energy storage (PHES) in Nepal (Lohani & Blakers, 2021). That study discussed the potential of solar generation and the energy balancing possibilities provided by off-river PHES, in light of the potential effects of climate change on Himalayan-based rivers, as well as the social and environmental threats from hydropower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical potential of hydropower in the country reaches about 83,000 MW, of which roughly 42,000 MW are considered economically viable(Program, 2018). Yet this is rather minuscule compared to the theoretical solar PV potential.Furthermore, land and environmental concerns caused by flooding at or near dam sites are common negative consequences of hydro projects(Lohani & Blakers, 2021). An additional concern is thatNepal lacks a diversified energy mix due to the current dominance of hydropower.…”
The energy mix in Nepal is currently dominated by the traditional and inefficient use of biomass (66.54%) and fossil fuels (27.24%), and energy poverty remains extremely high. This paper reviews relevant literature to provide an overview of the current renewable energy status and energy mix in Nepal, and to discuss prospects for the country to achieve a sustainable energy transition. Nepal-specific papers from peerreviewed sources and other agency and academic reports were included insofar as these discussed renewable energy and provided recommendations for policy-making on sustainable energy and related development goals. Despite the rapidly falling cost of solar photovoltaic, the share of modern renewable energy in Nepal is currently less than 3%. On this basis, and given the country's sustainable energy goals, we conclude that favorable and aggressive policies and strategies are needed to support adoption of clean energy in Nepal, comprised of a high share of solar generation equipped with battery storage, and balanced with storage such as off-river pumped hydropower technology.
Concerns related to climate change and global warming caused by anthropogenic activities and in particular fossil energy use have been increasing lately. Air pollution and volatile conventional fuel prices emphasize the need to transition the energy system towards very high shares of renewables. 100% renewable energy systems have been analyzed by many researchers starting from 1975. This bibliometric analysis reviews more than 600 scientific articles in which 100% renewable energy systems were surveyed. This study uses tools of bibliometric analysis, based on publication databases and data mining, together with review elements to understand the current status and trend of 100% renewable energy systems research. The focus of results is on quantitative parameters relating to number and publication types, collaborative links among authors, institutions, and countries. Collaborative networks provide the significant concentration of published papers within organizations and co-authorships globally. The results reveal that the dominant organizations and thus number of published papers are from Europe and the USA; however, almost all the established research organizations in the field of energy system analysis are not active in the field of 100% renewable energy systems analyses. The journals Energy and Applied Energy have the most articles, and accordingly the most citations. EnergyPLAN and LUT Energy System Transition Model have been the most active tools used to analyze 100% renewable energy systems according to numbers of articles and received citations. The topic of modeling approach indicates the term 'Energy System' has the highest frequency due to its emergence in the articles. This research provides a holistic overview on the more than four decades of research, and it reveals dynamics within the field with a compound annual growth rate of articles of 26% for the 2010s, the trend of publications, and author growth that comprises now almost 1400 authors with articles in the field.
“…In addition to hydropower, solar, wind energy, and biomass have seen major developments with an installed solar capacity of 54 MW in 2019 where 50 MW developed in the last ten years (IRENA, 2020). Moreover, Nepal can fulfil all of its energy demands with solar photovoltaics by covering just 1% of its land surface with panels, effectively eliminating the need for fossil fuels (Lohani & Blakers, 2021). At present, Nepal has surplus electricity in the wet season with a shortfall in power in the dry season as the majority of the existing hydropower plants are run-of-river types (Thapa et al, 2021).…”
Infrastructural development in agriculture will directly help achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the least developed countries (LDCs) as the majority of the population in these regions depend on agriculture. This study presents the case of Nepal, one of the LDCs and suggests the establishment of a urea manufacturing plant for improving agriculture productivity and fulfilling the SDGs of zero hunger, no poverty and decent work, and economic growth. Herein, in the context of Nepal, we have reviewed: (i) the status of SDGs of Nepal, (ii) agricultural productivity associated with usage and supply of urea, (iii) technologies associated with urea production, (iv) the feasibility of establishing a urea plant based on the raw material availability and sustainability and (v) the opportunity for economic and technological development. The hydropower-powered electrolysis and CO2 capture from cement industry flue gas were determined to be the strategically feasible and sustainable pathway for urea production and consequently, the fulfillment of SDGs in the context of Nepal. A detailed project study on the economics of the electrolysis-based urea manufacturing process is recommended to foster a sustainable development national plan for Nepal. Although this report highlights the various aspects of urea production in Nepal, this study can be useful for other LDCs dependent on agriculture to achieve SDGs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.