2020
DOI: 10.9771/ccrh.v33i0.30502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoliberalismo E Individualização Nas Políticas De Saúde Na Periferia Sul De São Paulo

Abstract: <p>Este artigo tem como objetivo compreender a expansão dos segmentos públicos e privados de saúde no atendimento da população de um território periférico da Zona Sul da cidade de São Paulo. Esta gestão é baseada nas mediações entre o Estado e os usuários dos Serviços Públicos de Saúde. Além dos usuários entrevistados, participaram da pesquisa, dirigentes sociais e agentes do programa de Atenção Primária de Saúde, a Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF). As questões propostas podem contribuir para identifica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It stipulated that ‘health is the right of every individual’ and that the state was required to provide ‘access to services designed to promote, protect and recover health’. The SUS was established to meet these constitutional duties, but in practice it often falls short (Biehl et al, 2009; Jurca, 2020; Sant’ana, 2017a). The Temer administration (2016–18) passed several austerity laws that restricted the SUS budget further (Doniec et al, 2016).…”
Section: Dignity In Legal and Healthcare Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It stipulated that ‘health is the right of every individual’ and that the state was required to provide ‘access to services designed to promote, protect and recover health’. The SUS was established to meet these constitutional duties, but in practice it often falls short (Biehl et al, 2009; Jurca, 2020; Sant’ana, 2017a). The Temer administration (2016–18) passed several austerity laws that restricted the SUS budget further (Doniec et al, 2016).…”
Section: Dignity In Legal and Healthcare Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%