Miles-Snow strategic typology has been successfully used in research in strategy and organizational design. The key dimension underlying Miles-Snow typology is the organizational response to changing environmental conditions. In this paper a new model is proposed based on the type of relationship of a firm with its stakeholders (shareholders, employees, customers, authorities etc.) who are considered as suppliers of key strategic resources. Relationship between the firm and its particular stakeholder is presented on an input-output like scheme and the variants of the position of the firm towards all its stakeholders serve as foundation for determining strategic orientation types. The proposed model allows interpreting the Miles and Snow typology in a new way and in particular the often neglected reactor type. Examples of the use of the proposed model are also provided. The reformulated model will allow for a new dynamic perspective in the context of the Miles and Snow model. The book itself (Miles & Snow, 1978) was translated in several languages; it has been cited almost 2,000 times in scholarly works. The typology of strategic orientation has been intensively used for two types of studies. The first type of studies takes "strategic orientation" as a framework for understanding implemented company's actions. Therefore, efforts are oriented towards discovery of composition of various industries or sectors by companies of different strategic types and to find the possible differences in strategic and tactical actions and performance between the companies with different strategic orientation (McDaniel & Kolari, 1987;Conant, Mokwa, & Varadarajan, 1990;Zahra, & Pearce 1990, Parnell & Wright, 1993Doty, Glick, & Huber, 1993;James & Hatten, 1994;Engelland & Summey, 1999;Woodside, Sullivan, & Trappey, 1999;Slater, & Olson, 2000, Brunk, 2003 The second type of work considers "strategic orientation" as patterns of strategic intent (see Hamel & Prahalad, 1989. These studies are devoted to external and especially internal factors (technologies, organizational structures, forms of knowledge acquisition and internal dissemination, organizational climates, leadership styles, human resource management systems) that may facilitate the translation of such an intent into company's actions (Dvir, Segev, & Shenhar, 1993;Beekun & Ginn, 1993;Rodríguez & Ventura, 2003;Kabanoff & Brown, 2008;Christiansen & Higgs, 2008;Ruekert & Walker 1987;Laugen, Boer, & Acur, 2006;Shannahan, Shannahan, & Alexandrov, 2010, Håkonsson, Burton, Obel, & Lauridsen, 2012. This direction of work is closer to the original approach of Miles and Snow.Indeed, "the book is unique in that it melds concepts from strategy, organizational theory, organizational behavior, and human resource management" (Ketchen, 2003, p. 95). Burton & Obel, (2004) The dualistic nature of Miles and Snow framework as simultaneously a position and a pattern (Mintzberg, Ashlstrand, & Lampel, 1998) impedes quick and consistent identification of a strategic type of the firm. Th...