2021
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for bronchiectasis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: The risk factors of bronchiectasis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have not yet been established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate and identify potential risk factors for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease accompanied by bronchiectasis. We reviewed eight electronic journal databases from their inception to November 2019 for observational studies with no language restrictions. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to evaluate the quality of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of bronchiectasis is often a result of a complex interplay of etiological factors [ 5 , 6 ]. Among these, one crucial and understated contributor is the role of surgical interventions, particularly pulmonary resections [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. These resections, often performed in the treatment of conditions, such as lung cancer or severe emphysema, can emerge as a significant risk factor for post-operative bronchiectasis [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of bronchiectasis is often a result of a complex interplay of etiological factors [ 5 , 6 ]. Among these, one crucial and understated contributor is the role of surgical interventions, particularly pulmonary resections [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. These resections, often performed in the treatment of conditions, such as lung cancer or severe emphysema, can emerge as a significant risk factor for post-operative bronchiectasis [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%