2020
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes after rotator cuff repair in the elderly as assessed by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score

Abstract: Rotator cuff tears are common among the elderly, and studies on the outcomes after rotator cuff repair in the elderly are limited. We carried out this meta-analysis with systematic literature search, aiming to clarify the outcomes after rotator cuff repair in the elderly as assessed by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score. We conducted a literature search through October 2019 in PubMed and EMBASE databases and performed meta-analysis to calculate the summary mean difference… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rotator cuff injuries are very common, especially in the elderly (1,(5)(6)(7). The development of arthroscopic technology has made the surgical treatment of rotator cuff injuries more acceptable to patients, greatly improving the shoulder joint function and quality of life of patients (8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotator cuff injuries are very common, especially in the elderly (1,(5)(6)(7). The development of arthroscopic technology has made the surgical treatment of rotator cuff injuries more acceptable to patients, greatly improving the shoulder joint function and quality of life of patients (8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CMS and ASES were used in this study because they evaluated shoulder function with high accuracy, reproducibility, and test-retest reliability, and they had had shown a good correlation with shoulder function. 9 , 13 , 30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%