2019
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Abstract: OBJECTIVES:To describe the prevalence of the reduced ankle-brachial index (ABI) in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) attended at a HF clinic in the metropolitan region of Porto Alegre, and to compar the patients to those with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).METHODS:A descriptive observational study, included patients referred to the heart failure clinic in HU-Ulbra with HFpEF or HFrEF and diastolic dysfunction, and measurements of ABIs using vascular Doppler equipment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the Colour Doppler echocardiography depicted an ejection fraction of less than 60% in most patients (67%), whereas 33% possessed an ejection fraction of more than 60%. Similarly, da Cunha et al 22 showed that, even though the incidence of PAD detection by ABI seemed to be significantly higher, about 19.4%, the difference was insignificant when patients were dichotomized by ejection fraction. Furthermore, various factors might clarify this phenomenon, including the distribution of IHD rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Furthermore, the Colour Doppler echocardiography depicted an ejection fraction of less than 60% in most patients (67%), whereas 33% possessed an ejection fraction of more than 60%. Similarly, da Cunha et al 22 showed that, even though the incidence of PAD detection by ABI seemed to be significantly higher, about 19.4%, the difference was insignificant when patients were dichotomized by ejection fraction. Furthermore, various factors might clarify this phenomenon, including the distribution of IHD rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%