2019
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e1273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different quantification methods for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains

Abstract: OBJECTIVES:This study aimed to evaluate several methods to estimate glucose consumption in the male Wister rat brain as measured by PET.METHODS:Fourteen male Wistar normoglycemic rats were studied. The input function consisted of seventeen blood samples drawn manually from the femoral artery. Glucose uptake values were calculated using the input function resulting from the arterial blood samples and the tissue time-activity curve derived from the PET images. The estimated glucose consumption rate (Ki) based on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Normalization of SUV by a reference region (such as pons or cerebellum) reduced the sample size down to 2 animals because of their much lower inter-and intra-individual variabilities. We noticed here that accounting for glycemia in SUV (SUV×Gly) did not reduce variability, in agreement with previous report [39].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Normalization of SUV by a reference region (such as pons or cerebellum) reduced the sample size down to 2 animals because of their much lower inter-and intra-individual variabilities. We noticed here that accounting for glycemia in SUV (SUV×Gly) did not reduce variability, in agreement with previous report [39].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, we compared the quantification of DTW to several existing simplified quantification methods, including Patlak analysis, FUR, and SUV, as a surrogate for the net influx rate K i . The proposed DTW protocol produced the most accurate quantification, followed by FUR and Patlak analysis, while SUV had the lowest correlation, which is consistent with previous study findings [ 20 , 26 , 46 ]. In terms of visual performance, the DTW protocol generated parametric K i and K 1 images that were more consistent with the reference and had less noise than the Patlak analysis had.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Whereas graphical analysis is a more accurate method of quantification, it could not be performed for the “late” studies; thus, we chose to quantify BGU using the FUR. Even though the FUR is considered a less accurate method, it correlates very well with Patlak ( 23 ) and is a valid alternative of quantification of PET data, which could be applied more often in research settings. The individuals included in the current data set had apparent normal cognitive function, but cognitive function testing was not performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although compartmental modeling and graphical Gjedde-Patlak analysis could have been used for the “early” data (as originally planned for these experiments ( 16 , 17 )), we used fractional uptake rate (FUR) for all data to homogenize the mathematical modeling across the whole data set. Of note, the Gjedde-Patlak analysis and FUR strongly correlate with each other ( 23 ). Thus, BGU (in μmol ⋅ 100 g −1 ⋅ min −1 ) was calculated at the voxel level as fractional uptake rate multiplied by the average plasma glucose concentration from the injection until the end of the brain scan, divided by the lumped constant for the brain (set at 0.65) ( 24 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%