2017
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2017(02)03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of laser pan-retinal photocoagulation with or without intravitreal bevacizumab injections on the OCT-measured macular choroidal thickness of eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Abstract: OBJECTIVES:To investigate the effect of laser pan-retinal photocoagulation with or without intravitreal bevacizumab injections on macular choroidal thickness parameters in eyes with high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy.METHODS:High-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients undergoing laser treatment were prospectively enrolled in this study. One eye was randomly selected for laser treatment combined with bevacizumab injections, study group, whereas the corresponding eye was subjected to laser tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…CMT was evaluated before and 1 month after injection. CMT reduction of eyes in group A was consistent with previous studies 21. Bevacizumab prevented ME secondary to PRP in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…CMT was evaluated before and 1 month after injection. CMT reduction of eyes in group A was consistent with previous studies 21. Bevacizumab prevented ME secondary to PRP in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…9 studies ( 7 , 8 , 11 17 ) reported changes of BCVA, among which 4 studies ( 7 , 12 , 16 , 17 ) specified the changes of BCVA in logMAR and 5 studies ( 8 , 11 , 13 – 15 ) in letters. 7 studies ( 9 11 , 13 , 15 17 ) measured the changes of CMT. 2 studies ( 7 , 16 ) reported changes of NVD and NVE, which were specified in DD% and DD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pappas et al concluded that IVT+Laser is better than IVB alone in reducing CMT, which went against the findings of Lam et al who indicated that IVT+Laser has no better CMT reduction at 24 weeks than IVT alone; and laser alone was significantly worse than the 2 aforementioned groups [ 55 , 56 ]. Surprisingly, Preti et al concluded that IVB+Laser may significantly increase the thickness compared with laser alone at a 4-week follow-up, however, they investigated macular choroidal thickness and not CMT [ 57 ]. It was proposed that IVT+laser might be superior due to its coupled anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic effects [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%