2012
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2012(07)07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia: treatment experience with fludarabine

Abstract: OBJECTIVES:The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the results of T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia treatment with fludarabine by assessing the complete hematologic response, the complete molecular response, progression-free survival, and overall survival.METHODS:We evaluated the records of six patients with T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia who were treated with fludarabine as a first-, second-, or third-line therapy, at a dose of 40 mg/m2, for three to five days per month and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are varying methods of disease treatment, which includes chemotherapy, immunotherapy or hormonal therapy, and combinations of these therapies. Among patients requiring treatment, which is approximately 60%, the overall survival at five years is approximately 62% [7,8]. Among all patients diagnosed with LGL leukemia, the overall survival at 10 years is approximately 70% [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are varying methods of disease treatment, which includes chemotherapy, immunotherapy or hormonal therapy, and combinations of these therapies. Among patients requiring treatment, which is approximately 60%, the overall survival at five years is approximately 62% [7,8]. Among all patients diagnosed with LGL leukemia, the overall survival at 10 years is approximately 70% [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…alemtuzumab, anti-CD52, and the humanized MiK-beta1 monoclonal antibody), combination chemotherapy (CTX, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone [CHOP]), and splenectomy have all been used in refractory/relapsed and treatment-naïve patients, but the response rates of these agents vary between studies. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Most physicians consider that high-dose combination chemotherapy regimens are relatively ineffective and are associated with more toxicity than benefits for this indolent disorder. Instead, chronic exposure to low-dose therapy seems more efficient than sequential high-dose combination chemotherapy, despite some patients being refractory to single oral MTX or CTX.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second patient, rituximab therapy was followed by immediate neutropenia recovery; then, one year later, the LGLL clone showed marked shrinkage [21]. Raposo et al and Verhoevan et al also described one and three cases, respectively, where rituximab therapy improved rheumatoid arthritis control and increased the neutrophil count, with sustained responses [20][21][22]. In the four cases of CD20+…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rituximab treatment was described in a few cases of T-LGLL, which were associated with rheumatoid arthritis, to control the autoimmune aspects of the disease [20][21][22]. In general, good responses were achieved with a monoclonal antibody against CD20.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%