2019
DOI: 10.5935/abc.20190076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence based decision making between PCI and CABG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it implies better targeting therapies for patients at higher risk for adverse cardiovascular events and also defines the best treatment strategy to avoid unnecessary interventions and adverse effects that harm low-risk patients. 31 Prognostic information is obtained through careful clinical evaluation and the evolution of patients during the first days and the patient's response to anti-ischemic and antithrombotic treatment when they are admitted to the hospital. There are several risk stratification scores that can predict death or AMI in ACS.…”
Section: Risk Stratification For a Better Approach To Acute Coronary Syndromesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it implies better targeting therapies for patients at higher risk for adverse cardiovascular events and also defines the best treatment strategy to avoid unnecessary interventions and adverse effects that harm low-risk patients. 31 Prognostic information is obtained through careful clinical evaluation and the evolution of patients during the first days and the patient's response to anti-ischemic and antithrombotic treatment when they are admitted to the hospital. There are several risk stratification scores that can predict death or AMI in ACS.…”
Section: Risk Stratification For a Better Approach To Acute Coronary Syndromesmentioning
confidence: 99%