2018
DOI: 10.5935/abc.20180022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prenatal Case of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In retrospective studies, primary CMs were categorized either as hypertrophic or nonhypertrophic/dilated phenotypes, with some further differentiating a mixed phenotype, suggesting that a simplifying classification appears to be more accurate and reproducible [ 5 , 6 , 8 ]. However, increased sophistication in ultrasound technologies has proposed a more detailed classification encompassing RCM and isolated NCCM, taking varying prognostic parameters and adapted prenatal genetic testing into account [ 7 , 24 , 25 ]. Consequently, in the absence of standardized guidelines and multiple definitions in use, the distribution of fetal phenotypes remains unclear with a prevalence of HCM varying from 18.0% to 60.0% and of DCM from 11.0% to 72.0%, as the most common subgroups [ 5 , 6 , 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In retrospective studies, primary CMs were categorized either as hypertrophic or nonhypertrophic/dilated phenotypes, with some further differentiating a mixed phenotype, suggesting that a simplifying classification appears to be more accurate and reproducible [ 5 , 6 , 8 ]. However, increased sophistication in ultrasound technologies has proposed a more detailed classification encompassing RCM and isolated NCCM, taking varying prognostic parameters and adapted prenatal genetic testing into account [ 7 , 24 , 25 ]. Consequently, in the absence of standardized guidelines and multiple definitions in use, the distribution of fetal phenotypes remains unclear with a prevalence of HCM varying from 18.0% to 60.0% and of DCM from 11.0% to 72.0%, as the most common subgroups [ 5 , 6 , 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%