2016
DOI: 10.5935/abc.20160173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

III SBC Guidelines on the Analysis and Issuance of Electrocardiographic Reports - Executive Summary

Abstract: The third version of the guidelines covers recently described topics, such as ion channel diseases, acute ischemic changes, the electrocardiogram in athletes, and analysis of ventricular repolarization. It sought to revise the criteria for overloads, conduction disorders, and analysis of data for internet transmission.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ECG2 presents all the electrocardiographic criteria for LSFB, repeatedly mentioned in the literature (Pérez‐Riera & Baranchuk, ; Perez‐Riera, Barbosa‐Barros, Penachini da Costa de Rezende Barbosa, Daminello‐Raimundo, & de Abreu, ), and ratified by the III SBC (Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia) Guidelines on the Analysis and Issuance of Electrocardiographic Reports—Executive Summary by Pastore et al. (Pastore, Samesima, & Pereira‐Filho, ). The transitory nature of the electrocardiographic changes rules out the possibility of any other possible cause for prominent anterior forces such as normal variant, athlete's heart, erroneous placement of precordial leads, vectorcardiographic right ventricular hypertrophy types A and B, lateral infarction (previously named posterior infarction), right bundle branch block, ventricular preexcitation type A, obstructive and nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Duchenne‐Erb disease, endomyocardiofibrosis, or the combination of any of the above (Pérez‐Riera, Barbosa‐Barros, & Baranchuk, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECG2 presents all the electrocardiographic criteria for LSFB, repeatedly mentioned in the literature (Pérez‐Riera & Baranchuk, ; Perez‐Riera, Barbosa‐Barros, Penachini da Costa de Rezende Barbosa, Daminello‐Raimundo, & de Abreu, ), and ratified by the III SBC (Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia) Guidelines on the Analysis and Issuance of Electrocardiographic Reports—Executive Summary by Pastore et al. (Pastore, Samesima, & Pereira‐Filho, ). The transitory nature of the electrocardiographic changes rules out the possibility of any other possible cause for prominent anterior forces such as normal variant, athlete's heart, erroneous placement of precordial leads, vectorcardiographic right ventricular hypertrophy types A and B, lateral infarction (previously named posterior infarction), right bundle branch block, ventricular preexcitation type A, obstructive and nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Duchenne‐Erb disease, endomyocardiofibrosis, or the combination of any of the above (Pérez‐Riera, Barbosa‐Barros, & Baranchuk, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third subgroup was perceived/evaluated needs: self-reported diabetes diagnosis (no, yes); self-reported hypertension diagnosis (no, yes); self-reported CD diagnostic time (up to ten years, over ten years); use of benznidazole (BZN) sometime in life (yes, no); and functional class (no limitations—class I, with limitations—class II, III, and IV) [ 20 ]. The QRS complex duration (up to 119 ms, longer than or equal to 120 ms) [ 21 ] and NT-proBNP categorized by age [ 22 ] (normal, abnormal) were obtained from ECG examination and blood samples, respectively. The assessment of self-rated health was based on the question: “How would you rate your health today?” and a Likert scale was adopted with the response options and then dichotomized as positive (good, very good, and medium) vs .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20]. The QRS complex duration (up to 119 ms, longer than or equal to 120 ms) [21] and NT-proBNP categorized by age [22] (normal, abnormal) were obtained from ECG examination and blood samples, PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES respectively. The assessment of self-rated health was based on the question: "How would you rate your health today?"…”
Section: Theoretical Model/variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia confere somente ao médico o poder de interpretação e inferência clínica das circunstâncias cardiológicas do paciente. Em caso de suporte clínico, o enfermeiro se faz relevante em situações emergenciais que demandam a necessidade de rápidas intervenções e tomadas de decisões [Pastore et al 2016]. Para tanto,é necessário que ambos os profissionais executem e entendam os procedimentos do exame de forma coesa ao que são descritos nas literaturas, diretrizes, regulamentações e normas hospitalares.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified