2014
DOI: 10.5935/abc.20140183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of left ventricular mass by echocardiogram in the ELSA-Brasil

Abstract: BackgroundEchocardiography, though non-invasive and having relatively low-cost, presents issues of variability which can limit its use in epidemiological studies.ObjectiveTo evaluate left ventricular mass reproducibility when assessed at acquisition (online) compared to when assessed at a reading center after electronic transmission (offline) and also when assessed by different readers at the reading center.MethodsEchocardiographers from the 6 ELSA-Brasil study investigation centers measured the left ventricul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LVED can reflect the size of the left ventricle and the degree of myocardial remodeling. A study by Tognon et al (12) found that the degree of left ventricular enlargement was significantly correlated with the decline of heart function and the increase of NT-pro BNP. Therefore, in the present study, the variations of LVEF and LVED were regarded as the primary indicators for evaluating the therapeutic effect of sacubitril/valsartan on cardiac function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LVED can reflect the size of the left ventricle and the degree of myocardial remodeling. A study by Tognon et al (12) found that the degree of left ventricular enlargement was significantly correlated with the decline of heart function and the increase of NT-pro BNP. Therefore, in the present study, the variations of LVEF and LVED were regarded as the primary indicators for evaluating the therapeutic effect of sacubitril/valsartan on cardiac function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%