2013
DOI: 10.5935/abc.20130215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcutaneous Tissue Thickness is an Independent Predictor of Image Noise in Cardiac CT

Abstract: BackgroundFew data on the definition of simple robust parameters to predict image noise in cardiac computed tomography (CT) exist. ObjectivesTo evaluate the value of a simple measure of subcutaneous tissue as a predictor of image noise in cardiac CT. Methods86 patients underwent prospective ECG-gated coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and coronary calcium scoring (CAC) with 120 kV and 150 mA. The image quality was objectively measured by the image noise in the aorta in the cardiac CTA, and low noi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuous data are presented as mean ± SD, and categorical variables are expressed as number and percentage. We defined “high noise” as >30 HU as in previous reports [13], [14], [15], and t test analysis was used to compare numerical variables whereas chi-square analysis was used to compare categorical variables between groups with noise >30 HU versus ≤30 HU. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between the image noise with fat volumes and other parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous data are presented as mean ± SD, and categorical variables are expressed as number and percentage. We defined “high noise” as >30 HU as in previous reports [13], [14], [15], and t test analysis was used to compare numerical variables whereas chi-square analysis was used to compare categorical variables between groups with noise >30 HU versus ≤30 HU. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between the image noise with fat volumes and other parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%