2013
DOI: 10.5935/abc.20130197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact on Hypertension Reclassification by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) according to the V Brazilian Guidelines on ABPM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study, however, sought to prospectively assess the impact of adopting different thresholds of normality for ABPM in comparison with measures performed by PHC physicians. The results, in terms of accuracy, were similar to those of other studies that indicated a low accuracy of BP obtained by conventional measures compared with that obtained by ABPM, 8 but with unique results when comparing different guidelines for 24-hour mean pressure thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The present study, however, sought to prospectively assess the impact of adopting different thresholds of normality for ABPM in comparison with measures performed by PHC physicians. The results, in terms of accuracy, were similar to those of other studies that indicated a low accuracy of BP obtained by conventional measures compared with that obtained by ABPM, 8 but with unique results when comparing different guidelines for 24-hour mean pressure thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Patients were assessed by their own PHC physicians during routine visits to the hypertension outpatient clinic from January 2013 to October 2014. Patients who had participated in a previous cross-sectional study, 8 which included an assessment with 24-hour ABPM, were contacted by phone and/or letter to participate in this new study. Those who were not able to answer the questionnaire, pregnant women, individuals with a non-sinus rhythm electrocardiogram, residents from outside the coverage area of the UBSs, patients who switched cities or who were not found, and those who did not tolerate the use of ABPM or who presented some technical difficulty in the application of the method were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations