2017
DOI: 10.5935/2177-1235.2017rbcp0057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the back-folded dermaglandular inferior pedicle in mammary amputation: improving results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies mentioned breast sized/tumour size ratio or resection size to breast size ratio ( 35 , 36 ), which can be used for small- and medium-sized breasts, using regional tissue transfer with local/regional flaps ( 18 , 35 37 ). We also observed new options, such as regional flaps ( 38 47 ), partial breast amputation ( 48 51 ), and flap guides for central tumours ( 52 ). It is important to accept and include these new indications in the spectrum of EO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies mentioned breast sized/tumour size ratio or resection size to breast size ratio ( 35 , 36 ), which can be used for small- and medium-sized breasts, using regional tissue transfer with local/regional flaps ( 18 , 35 37 ). We also observed new options, such as regional flaps ( 38 47 ), partial breast amputation ( 48 51 ), and flap guides for central tumours ( 52 ). It is important to accept and include these new indications in the spectrum of EO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The EO concept extends the original technique to the use of locoregional flaps ( 37 ) and other techniques where extensive resections would lead to loss of cosmetic results ( 54 ), while OS allows safe resection with acceptable results. New possibilities for EO are random flaps ( 55 ), pedicled flaps ( 38 ), latissimus dorsi miniflaps ( 12 , 39 ), and partial breast amputation ( 48 51 ). The techniques are associated with volume replacement ( 37 ) for small-to-moderate-sized breasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surgical technique of free nipple graft (FNG), or areola autograft (Figures 1-3), was first described about 100 years ago by the Hungarian-American doctor named Max Thorek in 1922 1,2 . Its application was originally meant exclusively to reduction mammaplasty, but later expanded its role into areas of mastology intervention, such as oncoplastic surgery 3 and chest adjustment surgery in transgender males 4,5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, the technique first described by Thorek 1,2 in 1922, i.e., FNG, represented a mark in mammoplasty reduction at the time, due to its ability to maintain the nipple areolar complex (NAC), compared to underexplored by prior used techniques, such glandular and skin excision described by Frenchmen Morestin in 1908 1 . Despite its aesthetic functional limitations, related to insufficient breast projection and total loss of sensibility and lactation function of the nipple 1,2,[9][10][11] , FNG remains the first choice technique in patients with gigantomastia weighing 1000 g and ptotic breasts 11 . Moreover, modifications of the original technique are providing new alternatives for indicating the use of FNG [9][10][11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%