2014
DOI: 10.5935/1808-8694.20140029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplitude speed of masticatory movements in total laryngectomy patients

Abstract: Age, and adaptive and compensatory changes appear to explain chewing better than factors related to total laryngectomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the type of food or material chewed could also generate differences in the speed analyzed. The choice of peanut for the present study was because it is a more standardized food when compared to a manufactured food, for example, cooked rice and rice cake in [ 3 ] and biscuit and bread in [ 32 , 33 ]; moreover, it is less perishable than other natural foods such as carrots, whose use is also stated in previous reviews [ 6 , 34 , 35 ]. However, most studies evaluating chewing speed prefer to use artificial foods such as gelatins [ 15 , 17 , 18 , 28 , 30 ] due to the better standardization with different consistencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the type of food or material chewed could also generate differences in the speed analyzed. The choice of peanut for the present study was because it is a more standardized food when compared to a manufactured food, for example, cooked rice and rice cake in [ 3 ] and biscuit and bread in [ 32 , 33 ]; moreover, it is less perishable than other natural foods such as carrots, whose use is also stated in previous reviews [ 6 , 34 , 35 ]. However, most studies evaluating chewing speed prefer to use artificial foods such as gelatins [ 15 , 17 , 18 , 28 , 30 ] due to the better standardization with different consistencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other devices employing the ultrasound principle “JMA (jaw-motion analyzer)” [ 11 ] and “ARCUSdigma, KaVo” [ 10 , 29 ] and also the electromagnetic principles “K6-1” and “K7” Myotronics mandibular scanner and “Electrognathographer JT-3D” [ 8 , 30 32 ] have been used to evaluate various clinical situations. These devices provide large amounts of data; however, independent of the principle applied, in all these cases, the presence of equipment parts, including facial arches fitted to the subjects' head and/or neck region, interferes with free, natural movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%